blocks|key|4957093|text|Drobo是一个很好的解决方案，因为它内置了驱动器冗余，功耗低，开销小。此外，还有一个附件，您可以购买，以服务drobo的网络，就像一个NAS。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4957094|我相信宏碁有一个与engadget的这里有点相似的产品。它比drobo便宜得多，可以执行NAS类型的服务，即:默认情况下，samba具有内部RAID。|offset|length|4957095|惠普的报价也是类似的。检查它的这里。多驱动器，一个情况下，网络共享和RAID。|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/acer-launches-easystore-home-server-1tb-expandable-storage-for/|1|http://www.engadget.com/tag/MediaSmart/^0|0|I|2|0|0|F|3|1^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$D|S|E|T|1|U]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$D|W|E|X|1|Y]]|A|$]]]|H|$I|$5|J|K|L|A|$M|N]]|O|$5|J|K|L|A|$M|P]]]]

Drobo is a good solution as it has built in drive redundancy, it's low power, and has little overhead. Plus there is an attachment you can purchase to serve the drobo out over the network just like a NAS.

I believe that Acer has a somewhat similar product shown <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/21/acer-launches-easystore-home-server-1tb-expandable-storage-for/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here</a> by engadget. It's a lot cheaper than the drobo, can do NAS type services, ie: samba, by default and has internal RAID. 

The offer from HP is similar. Check it out <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/MediaSmart/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">here.</a> Multiple drives, one case, network sharing and RAID.

blocks|key|4957334|text|我是一个Drobo用户，最新的Drobo：Drobo+FS旨在解决您所描述的问题。它是作为网络连接存储运行的，而不是直接附加存储。我认为它们是建得很好的盒子，运行安静，凉爽，便宜。Drobo真正闪耀的地方，国际海事组织，在他们的技术支持中--他们确实拥有强大的技术支持。我仍然能够获得对我的第一代Drobo的电话技术支持，我使用我的Mac。现在已经有3-4岁了。真是太棒了。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.drobo.com/products/drobo-fs.php^0|L|8|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

I'm a Drobo user and the latest Drobo: <a href="http://www.drobo.com/products/drobo-fs.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">the Drobo FS</a> is intended to solve the very problem you describe. It is meant to be run as network-attached storage, not as direct-attached storage. I think they're well-built boxes that run quiet and cool and cheap. Where the Drobo really shines, IMO, is in their tech support -- they do have great tech support. I'm still able to get on-the-phone tech support for my first-gen Drobo that I use with my Mac. It's going on 3-4 years old now. That's pretty great.

blocks|key|856073|text|Drobo不是为了这个目的而建造的。您应该看看Qnap或Netgear+ReadyNAS设备--它们更适合于业务使用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|856074|这个硬件网络上最好的资源是SmallNetBuilder。|offset|length|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/component/option,com_nas/Itemid,190^0|0|D|F|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$D|O|E|P|1|Q]]|A|$]]]|F|$G|$5|H|I|J|A|$K|L]]]]

Drobo is not built for this purpose. You should be looking at Qnap or Netgear ReadyNAS devices - they are more appropriate for business use.

The best resource on the net for this hardware is <a href="http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/component/option,com_nas/Itemid,190" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SmallNetBuilder</a>.

blocks|key|4957137|text|DROBO的真正目标是成为DAS+(直接连接存储)。您需要一个附加组件(DroboShare)或一台计算机，以便通过网络文件共享协议提供存储空间。据我所读，我不相信DroboShare和DroboPro一起使用是不可能的。我有点担心将自己限制在一个USB2.0连接所能达到的速度上。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.drobo.com/Products/droboshare.php^0|10|A|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@$A|L|B|M|1|N]]|C|$]]]|D|$E|$5|F|G|H|C|$I|J]]]]

The DROBO is really aimed at being a DAS (Direct Attached Storage). You need an additional component (<a href="http://www.drobo.com/Products/droboshare.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">DroboShare</a>) or a computer to make the storage space available via a network file sharing protocol. From what I have read, I don't believe it is possible to use the DroboShare with the DroboPro. I would be somewhat worried about limiting yourself to the speed that that can be achieved via a single USB 2.0 connection.

blocks|key|856005|text|我没有特别使用Drobo，但我使用了其他类似的小型NAS设备，如DNS-323。在我看来，它们很适合在不需要太多电力或空间的情况下保持合理的在线存储空间。但是，它们并不是负载下性能最好的东西，而且在有多个用户的办公环境中，您可能会发现事情的运行速度比netfinity慢一些。然而，只有测试才能确定，他们是非常好的小组件来玩.|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

I've not used a Drobo in particular, but I have used other similar small NAS devices, like the DNS-323. In my opinion, they're great for keeping a reasonable chunk of storage online without needing much power or space. However, they're not the most performant things under load, and in an office environment with multiple users you might find that things run a bit slower than the netfinity. However, only testing will tell for sure, and they are awfully nice little bits of kit to play with...

blocks|key|856094|text|海事组织DNS-323维基太棒了。我在我的网站上运行了一个小小的内联网页面，它通常会抽出~10+of+/S的传输，这对成本来说并不坏。如果你需要速度和钱，Qnap也是相当不错的。只是要贵得多。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

DNS-323 IMO. The wiki is awesome. I run a small intranet page off of mine and it usually pumps out ~10MB/s transfer, which is not bad for the cost. If you need speed and have the money, Qnap is also pretty good. Just much more expensive.

We have a Linux FC4 (old!) running with two mirrored sata drives (200gb each). This old setup has been working for years with Samba. The server is an IBM Netfinity that in my opinion, it uses too much power. Since it only does Fileserving, we'd like to shut down the box forever.
Has anyone tried the DROBO (or similar). Will a solution like that use less power? Are there any alternatives to DROBO?
We really don't use the server for other than DHCP and Fileserver, and the DHCP can be taken care by another server or a router. 
The idea is to use Drobo + the network stack that will allow us to leave it on and not need to connect it to a box.

Replace FileServer with DROBO

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

EdgeOne AI 安全实战专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我们有一个Linux FC4 (旧的！)运行两个镜像的sata驱动器(每个200 two )。这个旧的设置已经在Samba中运行了多年。服务器是一个，在我看来，它使用了太多的权力。因为它只做文件处理，所以我们想永远关闭这个盒子。有没有人试过DROBO (或类似的)。像这样的解决方案会消耗更少的能量吗？除了DROBO还有别的选择吗？除了DHCP和Fileserver之外，我们实际上不使用服务器，DH

问将FileServer替换为DROBO
EN

回答 6

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问将FileServer替换为DROBOEN

回答 6

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问将FileServer替换为DROBO
EN