blocks|key|4124255|text|现在，我们已经在Poweredge+840上设置了一个SBS+2008服务器，其中有两个西部数字RE3+SATA磁盘，作为SAS5iR控制器上的RAID1。这是为一个非常小的办公室(只有三个用户)，它的工作正常。磁盘速度不是惊人的，但它是相当可以接受的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4124256|JR|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|D|$]]

OK we've now set up an SBS 2008 server on a Poweredge 840 with two Western Digital RE3 SATA disks as a RAID1 on a SAS5iR controller. This is for a very small office (only three users) and it's working OK. The disk speed is not stunning, but it's quite acceptable.

JR

blocks|key|386660|text|在这种情况下，不要费心于Perc和RAID5的额外费用。在这种情况下，坚持使用RAID1，因为它以更好的价格为您提供了良好的数据保护。而是将一些额外的钱花在内存上，以确保您想要运行的服务不会影响性能。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

Don't bother with the extra expense of the Perc and RAID5 in this situation. Stick to RAID1 in this case as it gives you good data protection at a better price point. Rather spend some of the extra money on memory to ensure that the services that you want to run are not impacting performance.

blocks|key|386612|text|4磁盘RAID-5不太可能增加很多--即使所有的服务都在使用中，一个小企业可能也不会产生太多的磁盘流量。只需确保机器有足够的内存用于所有服务。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

A 4-disk RAID-5 is unlikely to add much - even with all the services in use a small business is probably won't generate much disk traffic. Just make sure the machine has enough memory for all of the services.

blocks|key|386692|text|对于像您这样的5用户网络来说，磁盘性能不应该是一个问题，除非您进行大量的文件共享或诸如此类的事情。就磁盘I/O而言，SBS+2008本身并不比2003年要求更高；如果您的CPU和RAM配置能够处理2008年，并且您不会给服务器带来比2003年更多的负载，那么一切都会好起来的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|entityMap^0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|B|$]]

Disk performance shouldn't be a problem for a 5-user network like yours, unless you do heavy file sharing or something like that. SBS 2008 per se isn't more demanding than 2003 in terms of disk I/O; if your CPU and RAM configuration can handle 2008 and you're not putting more load on your server than you did with 2003, then everything will be fine.

blocks|key|386724|text|我知道对于一个小商店来说，这似乎是很多硬件，但是运行Exchange确实需要两个数组(如果不是两个raid控制器的话！)所以数据文件和日志不在同一个磁盘上.|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|386725|数据文件磁盘阵列的故障(我在RAID5中见过多个驱动器一次失败)意味着只要日志文件位于单独的数组上，就可以恢复到某个时间点。|386726|同一个磁盘上的日志失败意味着只能将邮件发送到最近的备份.|386727|就像我所知道的那样，很多商店都会放弃开支，但我坚持这一点，因为它曾经救了我一次，我也被抓了一次！|386728|我想，如果用户处于缓存模式outlook中，那么可以为current...as提供一个解决办法--在将online...if日志带回exchange之前，确保从工作站导出他们的邮件，数据库将比client...and上的OST文件更老--客户端通常不会删除ost，然后rebuilt..so导出ost+first...make感觉？|386729|后来。|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|L|$]]

I know it seems like a lot of hardware for a small shop, but running Exchange really needs two arrays, (if not two raid controllers!) so that the datafiles and logs aren't on the same disks...

Failure of your datafile disks array (and I have seen multilple drives fail at once in RAID5) means you can recover to a point in time as long as the log files are on a separate array.

Failure with logs on the same disk means you can only get mail up to your most recent backup...

Just an fyi as I know many shops will forego the expense, but I push on this as it has saved me once, and I got caught out on it once!!

I suppose if users are in cached mode outlook then mail can be brought current...as a workaround--just be sure to export their mail from the workstation before bringing exchange back online...if logs are gone, the database will be older than the OST file on the client...and the client won't usually connect....until the ost is deleted and then rebuilt..so export the ost first...make sense?

Later.

Has anyone experience of running SBS 2008 Standard (so no SQL) on low spec hardware? In particular I'm concerned about the disk system, since CPU and memory are cheap these days.

We have a number of customers running SBS 2003 on Poweredge 840s with a SAS5/i RAID controller (no battery so write-thru not write-back) and two 146GB disks as a RAID1. For a 5 user network this is more than adequate, but SBS 2008 seems considerably more demanding and the SAS5/i is a fairly basic controller. However using a Perc5/i and a three or four disk RAID5 adds a lot to the cost and our small customers are likely to baulk at the cost.

Has anyone used SBS 2008 on hardware like this? Is the SAS5/i and 146GB of disk space adequate?

Thanks,

John Rennie

Entry level hardware for SBS 2008 Standard

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

EdgeOne AI 安全实战专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

有没有人在低规格的硬件上运行SBS 2008标准(所以没有SQL)？尤其是我关心的是磁盘系统，因为现在CPU和内存都很便宜。我们有很多客户在Poweredge 840上运行SBS 2003，带有一个SBS 5/I RAID控制器(没有电池，所以没有写)和两个146 as磁盘作为RAID1。对于一个5用户网络来说，这已经足够了，但是SBS 2008看起来要求要高得多，而SAS5 5/I是一个相当基本

问SBS 2008标准入门级硬件
EN

回答 5

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问SBS 2008标准入门级硬件EN

回答 5

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

Server Fault用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问SBS 2008标准入门级硬件
EN