在赋值之前设置数组的长度有什么好处吗?
例如,
let arr = [];
arr.length = 10;
arr[0] = 'a'; // arr.length === 10
...
arr[9] = 'i'; // arr.length === 10甚至是
let arr = new Array(10);
arr[0] = 'a'; // arr.length === 10
...
arr[9] = 'i'; // arr.length === 10对比
let arr = [];
arr[0] = 'a'; // arr.length === 1
arr[1] = 'b'; // arr.length === 2
...
arr[9] = 'i'; // arr.length === 10发布于 2018-12-20 07:01:30
至少在V8中,new Array(length)的速度似乎比替代品快得多,至少有一个数量级。包括push方法只是为了好玩:
(警告:运行以下代码会阻塞浏览器一段时间)
const t0 = performance.now();
for (let i = 0; i < 2e6; i++) {
const arr = [];
arr.length = 7;
arr[0] = 'a';
arr[1] = 'b';
arr[2] = 'c'
arr[3] = 'd'
arr[4] = 'e'
arr[5] = 'f';
arr[6] = 'g';
}
const t1 = performance.now();
for (let i = 0; i < 2e6; i++) {
const arr = new Array(7);
arr[0] = 'a';
arr[1] = 'b';
arr[2] = 'c'
arr[3] = 'd'
arr[4] = 'e'
arr[5] = 'f';
arr[6] = 'g';
}
const t2 = performance.now();
for (let i = 0; i < 2e6; i++) {
const arr = [];
arr[0] = 'a';
arr[1] = 'b';
arr[2] = 'c'
arr[3] = 'd'
arr[4] = 'e'
arr[5] = 'f';
arr[6] = 'g';
}
const t3 = performance.now();
for (let i = 0; i < 2e6; i++) {
const arr = [];
arr.push('a');
arr.push('b');
arr.push('c');
arr.push('d');
arr.push('e');
arr.push('f');
arr.push('g');
}
const t4 = performance.now();
console.log('arr.length = length', t1 - t0);
console.log('new Array(length)', t2 - t1);
console.log('arr = [] only', t3 - t2);
console.log('push only', t4 - t3);
在火狐上,两者之间的差别不那么显著,但它仍然存在-- new Array(length)的速度似乎是其他可能性的两倍。你可能会认为
const arr = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g'];效率会更高,在FF中是这样的(再增加几个数量级),但它似乎与new Array(length) in V8中的大致相同:
const t0 = performance.now();
for (let i = 0; i < 2e8; i++) {
const arr = new Array(7);
arr[0] = 'a';
arr[1] = 'b';
arr[2] = 'c'
arr[3] = 'd'
arr[4] = 'e'
arr[5] = 'f';
arr[6] = 'g';
}
const t1 = performance.now();
for (let i = 0; i < 2e8; i++) {
const arr = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g'];
}
const t2 = performance.now();
console.log('new Array(length)', t1 - t0);
console.log(`arr = ['a', 'b', ...]`, t2 - t1);
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53863753
复制相似问题